Alexander Skwar wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 26, 2000 at 08:26:35PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > All I'm getting at is that "non-GPL" (which is what the guy was pushing > > on) is not a good reason to exclude a package. Exclude it for other > > Well, yes, that's what I said, but that's not what I meant. I rather meant, > that un-free programs should be excluded. Excluding every non GPL > application would be way to harsh, granted. I buy argument 1, if it isn't free... Not only would excluding non-GPL code be harsh, but it would pretty much lead to a dysfunctional system... You wouldn't believe the number of packages that have different licenses.
- [Cooker] Re: [CHRPM] xv-3.10a-8mdk Alexander Skwar
- Re: [Cooker] Re: [CHRPM] xv-3.10a-8mdk David Walluck
- Re: [Cooker] Re: [CHRPM] xv-3.10a-8mdk Guillaume Cottenceau
- Re: [Cooker] Re: [CHRPM] xv-3.10a-8mdk Alexander Skwar
- Re: [Cooker] Re: [CHRPM] xv-3.10a-8m... john . cavan
- Re: [Cooker] Re: [CHRPM] xv-3.1... Pixel
- Re: [Cooker] Re: [CHRPM] xv... john . cavan
- Re: [Cooker] Re: [CHRPM... Alexander Skwar
- Re: [Cooker] Re: [CHRPM... john . cavan
- Re: [Cooker] Re: [CHRPM... Guillaume Cottenceau
- Re: [Cooker] Re: [CHRPM... john . cavan
- Re: [Cooker] Re: [CHRPM... Guillaume Cottenceau
- Re: [Cooker] Re: [CHRPM... john . cavan
- Re: [Cooker] Re: [CHRPM... Guillaume Cottenceau
- Re: [Cooker] Re: [CHRPM] xv-3.1... Alexander Skwar
- Re: [Cooker] Re: [CHRPM] xv... john . cavan
- Re: [Cooker] Re: [CHRPM... Guillaume Cottenceau
- Re: [Cooker] Re: [CHRPM] xv... Guillaume Cottenceau
- Re: [Cooker] Re: [CHRPM] xv-3.10a-8mdk Xavier Bertou
