Alexander Skwar wrote:
> 
> On Wed, Jul 26, 2000 at 08:26:35PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > All I'm getting at is that "non-GPL" (which is what the guy was pushing
> > on) is not a good reason to exclude a package. Exclude it for other
> 
> Well, yes, that's what I said, but that's not what I meant.  I rather meant,
> that un-free programs should be excluded.  Excluding every non GPL
> application would be way to harsh, granted.

I buy argument 1, if it isn't free...

Not only would excluding non-GPL code be harsh, but it would pretty much
lead to a dysfunctional system... You wouldn't believe the number of
packages that have different licenses.

Reply via email to