[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Yves Duret) writes: > nop a CD per liscence will be better : > imagine you could choose exacltly what kind of liberty you want.. > so one for GPL > one for Qt > one for BSD (perhaps some dofferent BSD liscneces :) > one for MPL > one for Artistic > one for ... Hum, please just answer one very simple, very little question: "Are you serious?" -- Guillaume Cottenceau -- Distribution Developer for MandrakeSoft http://www.mandrakesoft.com/~gc/
- Re: [Cooker] a pure RMS compliant Linux-Mandrake... Guillaume Cottenceau
- Re: [Cooker] a pure RMS compliant Linux-Mand... Pablo Saratxaga
- Re: [Cooker] a pure RMS compliant Linux-Mand... David Walluck
- Re: [Cooker] a pure RMS compliant Linux-... Graham Percival
- Re: [Cooker] a pure RMS compliant Linux-Mandrake... Pixel
- Re: [Cooker] a pure RMS compliant Linux-Mandrake dist... Eric MC.D
- Re: [Cooker] a pure RMS compliant Linux-Mandrake... Guillaume Cottenceau
- Re: [Cooker] a pure RMS compliant Linux-Mandrake... Yves Duret
- Re: [Cooker] a pure RMS compliant Linux-Mand... Guillaume Cottenceau
- Re: [Cooker] a pure RMS compliant Linux-Mandrake dist... Civileme
- Re: [Cooker] a pure RMS compliant Linux-Mandrake dist... Geoffrey Lee
- RE: [Cooker] a pure RMS compliant Linux-Mandrake dist... Geoffrey Lee
- RE: [Cooker] a pure RMS compliant Linux-Mandrake... David Walluck
- Re: [Cooker] a pure RMS compliant Linux-Mand... Guillaume Cottenceau
