On 12 Jul 2000, Guillaume Cottenceau wrote: > This project would be a RMS-"test" if you prefer. Why not do a BSD-test then? I think it ridiculous. Some people might perfer BSD over GPL. Why assume RMS-test is even a good thing? Why not a BSD-test? Why not a QT-test distribution? Well, this is not practical, as there is not enough software under QT licenses, but then, a GPL-only dist is not practical either...
- RE: [Cooker] a pure RMS compliant Linux-Mandrake dist... Geoffrey Lee
- Re: [Cooker] a pure RMS compliant Linux-Mandrake... Guillaume Cottenceau
- RE: [Cooker] a pure RMS compliant Linux-Mand... Geoffrey Lee
- RE: [Cooker] a pure RMS compliant Linux-... David Walluck
- Re: [Cooker] a pure RMS compliant Linux-... Guillaume Cottenceau
- Re: [Cooker] a pure RMS compliant Linux-Mandrake dist... Armisis Aieoln
- Re: [Cooker] a pure RMS compliant Linux-Mandrake... Guillaume Cottenceau
- Re: [Cooker] a pure RMS compliant Linux-Mandrake dist... john . cavan
- Re: [Cooker] a pure RMS compliant Linux-Mandrake... Guillaume Cottenceau
- Re: [Cooker] a pure RMS compliant Linux-Mand... Pablo Saratxaga
- Re: [Cooker] a pure RMS compliant Linux-Mand... David Walluck
- Re: [Cooker] a pure RMS compliant Linux-... Graham Percival
- Re: [Cooker] a pure RMS compliant Linux-Mandrake... Pixel
- Re: [Cooker] a pure RMS compliant Linux-Mandrake dist... Eric MC.D
- Re: [Cooker] a pure RMS compliant Linux-Mandrake... Guillaume Cottenceau
- Re: [Cooker] a pure RMS compliant Linux-Mandrake... Yves Duret
- Re: [Cooker] a pure RMS compliant Linux-Mand... Guillaume Cottenceau
- Re: [Cooker] a pure RMS compliant Linux-Mandrake dist... Civileme
- Re: [Cooker] a pure RMS compliant Linux-Mandrake dist... Geoffrey Lee
