Re: [Cooker]

[Michael Irving]

> Might seem like a silly question.... but... Why does the hackkernel RPM
> automatically install an SMP kernel. I would think that a single processor
RPM
> would be convenient and more practical. I'm in the process of compiling
the
> source anyways, but for people that don't want to do that the nonSMP RPM
would
> be nice.

I would *think* that the hackkernel patches the mandrake team have gathered
together won't work without smp.. I tried disabling the smp and got
compiling errors due to smp_num_processors isn't defined..

I think there is a bad patch in there somewhere..