Joe Baker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > What was the reason that all those extra steps were necessary to > support the ReiserFS? reiserfs is in module. we won't put it in the main kernel otherwise it'll get too big&bloated. as for ext2, we keep it in the kernel for compatibility
- Re: [Cooker] updating kernel through rpms Mike & Tracy Holt
- Re: [Cooker] updating kernel through rpms Mike & Tracy Holt
- [Cooker] Linux and security: off topic? Franck Martin
- Re: [Cooker] updating kernel through rpms Vincent Danen
- Re: [Cooker] updating kernel through rpms Mike & Tracy Holt
- Re: [Cooker] updating kernel through rp... Vincent Danen
- Re: [Cooker] updating kernel throug... Alexander Skwar
- Re: [Cooker] updating kernel t... Pixel
- Re: [Cooker] updating kern... Amien Salie
- Re: [Cooker] updating kern... Joe Baker
- Re: [Cooker] updating kern... Pixel
- Re: [Cooker] updating kern... Amien Salie
- Re: [Cooker] updating kern... Ron Stodden
- Re: [Cooker] updating kern... Anton Graham
- Re: [Cooker] updating kern... Ron Stodden
- Re: [Cooker] updating kernel t... Vincent Danen
- Re: [Cooker] updating kernel through rpms Vincent Danen
- Re: [Cooker] updating kernel through rpms Mike & Tracy Holt
- Re: [Cooker] updating kernel through rpms Vincent Danen
- Re: [Cooker] updating kernel through rp... Mike & Tracy Holt
- Re: [Cooker] updating kernel throug... Vincent Danen
