Geoffrey Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Yo!
>
> [...]
>
> >
> > > > This is (at the moment) totally wrong! libxml2 is an own package,
> > > > the only problem so far is that you can't install both devel
> > > > packages of libxml and libxml2. One package needed to have libxml
> > >=20
> > > Yes but there are some incompat problemw ith libxml and libxml2, (AFAIK) =
> > and besidew
> > > when libxml2 was first released daniel of w3.org put it in a package call=
> > ed
> > > libxml2 ...
> >
> > Thats what I wrote a few lines below :-/ The problem was here
> > that there is a wrong Requires: libxml =3D 2.2.2 in the config instead
> > of libxml2. We should continue the libxml2 versus libxml problems
> > in my other new thread.
>
> ok I get it now ..probably Yoann did a hardcode of
> Requires: libxml = %{version} instead of %{name} = %{version} which definitely
> work better for most cases, though I can't be sure, I have go to check
> the specfile to confirm that I am right.
Thanks for the report, I just corrected it :)
--
-- Yoann http://www.mandrakesoft.com/~yoann/
An engineer from NVidia, while asking him to release cards specs said :
"Actually, we do write our drivers without documentation."
