On Thu, Aug 24, 2000 at 07:43:58PM +0200, Pixel wrote: > lilo is 200KB, grub is 266KB, not that much is it? Yes, it is much, because one of them is not needed. There hasn't been an answer yet, so: Why both? And actually what Pixel said isn't an answer either. Just because both packages are quite small doesn't rectify to *NEED* both. Having both just adds to the overall bloatness of the system. Alexander Skwar -- Homepage: http://www.digitalprojects.com | http://www.dp.ath.cx Sichere Mail? Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED] fuer GnuPG Keys ICQ: 7328191
- Re: [Cooker] both grub and lilo? Chmouel Boudjnah
- Re: [Cooker] both grub and lilo? Antony Suter
- Re: [Cooker] both grub and lilo? Chmouel Boudjnah
- Re: [Cooker] both grub and lilo? Pixel
- Re: [Cooker] both grub and lilo... Chmouel Boudjnah
- Re: [Cooker] both grub and lilo? Antony Suter
- Re: [Cooker] both grub and lilo? Chmouel Boudjnah
- Re: [Cooker] both grub and lilo? Guillaume Cottenceau
- Re: [Cooker] both grub and lilo? Guillaume Cottenceau
- Re: [Cooker] both grub and lilo? Alexander Skwar
- Re: [Cooker] both grub and lilo? Alexander Skwar
- Re: [Cooker] both grub and lilo? Chmouel Boudjnah
- Re: [Cooker] both grub and lilo? Alexander Skwar
- Re: [Cooker] both grub and lilo? Chmouel Boudjnah
- Re: [Cooker] both grub and lilo? Chmouel Boudjnah
- Re: [Cooker] both grub and lilo? Guillaume Cottenceau
- Re: [Cooker] both grub and lilo? Alexander Skwar
- Re: [Cooker] both grub and lilo? Peter Ruskin
- Re: [Cooker] both grub and lilo? Alexander Skwar
- Re: [Cooker] both grub and lilo? Patti Wavinak
- Re: [Cooker] both grub and lilo? Peter Ruskin
