Alexander Skwar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Fine, but why are both packages needed by basesystem? It would be easy to > specify a "Provides: mbr" in both packages and then to only "Requires: mbr" in > the basesystem SPEC file. This way only one would be needed, and users who > have no problems with grub could uninstall lilo, or the other way around. > And actually even a "Requires: mbr" in basesystem would be bloat for the > users of loadlin. I don't see why lilo *AND* grub are REQUIRED. Having > one, or even none, is good enough! pixel ? > BTW: What do you mean by ''safe-ing''? ''to be safe'' it's a ...pastaga[1]-english... [1] South of french people will understand (which i'm not thanks god). -- MandrakeSoft Inc http://www.chmouel.org San-Francisco, CA USA --Chmouel
- Re: [Cooker] both grub and lilo... Pixel
- Re: [Cooker] both grub and ... Chmouel Boudjnah
- Re: [Cooker] both grub and lilo? Antony Suter
- Re: [Cooker] both grub and lilo... Chmouel Boudjnah
- Re: [Cooker] both grub and lilo? Guillaume Cottenceau
- Re: [Cooker] both grub and lilo? Guillaume Cottenceau
- Re: [Cooker] both grub and lilo? Alexander Skwar
- Re: [Cooker] both grub and lilo? Alexander Skwar
- Re: [Cooker] both grub and lilo? Chmouel Boudjnah
- Re: [Cooker] both grub and lilo? Alexander Skwar
- Re: [Cooker] both grub and lilo? Chmouel Boudjnah
- Re: [Cooker] both grub and lilo... Chmouel Boudjnah
- Re: [Cooker] both grub and lilo? Guillaume Cottenceau
- Re: [Cooker] both grub and lilo... Alexander Skwar
- Re: [Cooker] both grub and lilo? Peter Ruskin
- Re: [Cooker] both grub and lilo? Alexander Skwar
- Re: [Cooker] both grub and lilo? Patti Wavinak
- Re: [Cooker] both grub and lilo? Peter Ruskin
- Re: [Cooker] both grub and lilo? Quel Qun
- Re: [Cooker] both grub and lilo? Alexander Skwar
- Re: [Cooker] both grub and lilo? Quel Qun
