Yo!
> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=unsubscribe%20cooker>
> List-Post: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> List-Owner: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> How "runable" is cooker as an every day machine? I really like the extras
Well if you sak me you will encounter bad behavior from time to time.
I run a cookerized machine, and I dont make a lot of complaints here. Running
a full cooker box v.s. running a stable distrib + a portion of cooker stuff then
of course the latter will be more stable. In particular, things like the kernel
can be unstalbe during the 2.2.xpre stages.
> that 7.2beta has (*cough* KDE2!!! *cough*), and would like to use them, but
> don't know how stable/unstable it is. I know that the top locale problem has
> been fixed in cooker, that's why I would want to use cooker instead of the
> 7.2 beta.
>
KDE is still in BETA. It is huge, Chris may make some mistakes when packaging
but there are lots of folks here who run the KDE2 beta ...
> Does anyone know of a script to do automagic updates from the Cooker FTP
> site so that I would be able to keep my machine up-to-date whenever I run
> it?
>
rsync? autorpm?
--
Geoff
