"Duane Mohney" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I am very happy with what I see so far, however I am a bit dissapointed that > the installer let me choose development as my install base, even though I > said that I didn't have the second CD. Since most of the *devel*.rpm > packages are on the second CD. good point i think. gc, warly, what about adding a warning when having only one cd and choosing devel? thanks, cu Pixel.
- Re: [Cooker] Beta??? root
- Re: [Cooker] Beta??? Pixel
- RE: [Cooker] Beta??? Steven R. Hatfield
- Re: [Cooker] Beta??? root
- Re: [Cooker] Beta??? Stefan van der Eijk
- Re: [Cooker] Beta??? RedHog (Egil M�ller)
- Re: [Cooker] Beta??? Guillaume Cottenceau
- Re: [Cooker] Beta??? root
- RE: [Cooker] Beta??? Steven R. Hatfield
- RE: [Cooker] Beta??? Duane Mohney
- Re: [Cooker] Beta??? Pixel
- Re: [Cooker] Beta??? Warly
- Re: [Cooker] Beta??? Guillaume Cottenceau
- Re: [Cooker] Beta??? RedHog (Egil M�ller)
- Re: [Cooker] Beta??? Dr Michael Powell PhD
- Re: [Cooker] Cooker as a tough forum Leon Brooks
- Re: [Cooker] Beta??? Guillaume Cottenceau
- Re: [Cooker] Beta??? root
- RE: [Cooker] Beta??? Gregory Walters
- Re: [Cooker] Beta??? Ben Reser
- Re: [Cooker] Beta??? David Foresman
