"RedHog (Egil M�ller)" wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] ("Duane Mohney") writes:
>
> > I don't know that <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> is so upset about, it was very
> > clear when I downloaded the ISO's that this was not a stable version.
> >
> > I am very happy with what I see so far, however I am a bit dissapointed that
> > the installer let me choose development as my install base, even though I
> > said that I didn't have the second CD. Since most of the *devel*.rpm
> > packages are on the second CD.
> >
> > Once I got the second CD burned, I am very pleased with the install that
> > resulted. Hopefully I will be able to contribute something meaningful soon.
> >
> > Thanks
> > Duane
>
> I think this is the main problem - our current separation of packages:
> devel things are on second CD, while we have several programs doing
> more or less the same work (but with different look&feel) on the first
> CD. But this has been discussed a lot within Mdk... If a lot of users
> agree with you, maybe the opinion of the persons who are for the
> current separation will change their mind!
that mail is a week old man...besides cooker is a tough forum, if you say
anything at all everybody spends their time rebuking you and lose focus of what
we're trying to do here. Everything is fine, 7.2 is coming along nicely, but if
you can't run with the big dogs , stay on the porch!
michael powell
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
