"Matthew P. Barnson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> As a Bugzilla maintainer, I need to ask:
> 1. Will you be returning the code changes back to mozilla.org? If possible,
> as patches diff'ed against current CVS would be great.
I doubt those patches are usefull for main code, they are very specific to
our version and needs. But yes, they will be available ASAP .
> 2. If the answer to question #1 is "no", I'll gladly take your hacks and see
> if they are applicable to Bugzilla 2.12...
If you are willing to do it, I'd be glad to send you our source code.
But it is based on an OLD bugzilla version. Before some major
changes in bugzilla.
>
> On Wed, 27 Sep 2000, Jerome Martin scratched this in the dirt:
> For the impatient, here are some details :
> >
> > - The system is based on bugzilla, but with majors code changes
> > - An email interface has been added, but will not be available right away
> > to the outside world, beacause it still needs testing and improvement.
> > - The system will be available only through https (SSL), in order to limit
> > security problems (passwords, cookies, etc ...)
> > - An account on the system will be required to use it, but the creation
> > process is as fast a filling a form and receiving a login/password pair by
> > email a few minutes (seconds ?) after. Of course it is free, and code
> > source will be available upon request to anyone. I say "upon request",
> > because the hacks in it are too ugly for me to shamelessly broadcast it on
> > the net ;-)
>
> --
> Matthew P. Barnson Manager, Systems Administration
> Excite@Home [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
--
Jerome Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Quality Assurance <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
