On Tue, 10 Oct 2000, Jason Straight wrote: > I understand there's a special kernel compiler or something on redhat because > the kernel won't compile with 2.96? Is that so or am I wrong here? > > In either case 2.96 is the wrong way to go. That is true. They used to have egcs to compile the kernel anyway (even though gcc worked). As I stated before, The 2.96 snapshot I used a while back (0.1mdk I think) couldn't even compile basic apps like gaim or xchat (and these aren't C++ programs).
- [Cooker] Re: [CHRPM] gcc-2.96-0.7mdk Bryan Paxton
- Re: [Cooker] Re: [CHRPM] gcc-2.96-0.7mdk David Walluck
- Re: [Cooker] Re: [CHRPM] gcc-2.96-0.7mdk Bryan Paxton
- Re: [Cooker] Re: [CHRPM] gcc-2.96-0.7mdk Jason Straight
- Re: [Cooker] Re: [CHRPM] gcc-2.96-0.... David Walluck
- Re: [Cooker] Re: [CHRPM] gcc-2.... Jason Straight
- Re: [Cooker] Re: [CHRPM] gc... Pixel
- Re: [Cooker] Re: [CHRPM] gc... Vincent Danen
- Re: [Cooker] [CHRPM] gc... Digital Wokan
- Re: [Cooker] [CHRPM] gc... Ron Stodden
- Re: [Cooker] [CHRPM] gc... Ron Stodden
- Re: [Cooker] [CHRPM] gc... Thomas M. Beaudry
- Re: [Cooker] Re: [CHRPM] gcc-2.96-0.... Chmouel Boudjnah
- Re: [Cooker] Re: [CHRPM] gcc-2.... Yoann Vandoorselaere
- Re: [Cooker] Re: [CHRPM] gcc-2.96-0.7mdk Pixel
