Well, good thing C++ coders only write from Mandrake then. After all,
if I were a coder writing software for testing against an alpha of the
new compiler, I'd certainly want to use an unofficial patched version to
test my software with.
</SARCASM>
I thought when a package was beta to cooker, that meant it had been
stabilized by the developer as much as possible, and was now being
integrated for installing smoothly via RPM. I never realized that beta
testing for Mandrake meant beta testing rpm's of beta code.
Chmouel Boudjnah wrote:
>
> Mattias Eriksson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Does this means that you are not going to release another stable release of
> > Mandrake before gcc-3.0 is released? Or does it mean that you are kicking the
> > gcc developers in the groin and release the next Mandrake release with
> > gcc-2.96?
>
> It mean we going to take a highly patched/fixed/modified version of gcc2.96 if
> gcc3.0 is not ready, we going to usethe save version that the leader
> has, period.
>
> --
> MandrakeSoft Inc http://www.chmouel.org
> Paris, France --Chmouel
--
Digital Wokan
Tribal mage of the electronics age
Guerilla Linux Warrior
