Mattias Eriksson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> At 12 October, 2000 Thierry Vignaud wrote:
> > And as for us, we _never_ release a distro with gcc-2.96.
>
> To quote Guillaume Cottenceau:
> "if unfortunately gcc3 will not be out for our next release we will have to
> find a solution, and it will not be to revert to 2.95 for sure."
and to quote me:
'we've never released a distro with gcc-2.96' :-) (see above ??)
past!='possible future', ok?
> Have you people at mandrakesoft even discussed this matter?
>
> As I always have said, if you are just going to use it for cooker, and _never_
> do a release using this snapshot (you can call it what ever, but it's not a
> official gcc release), I have no problems at all. I still dont see why you have
> to rush into things without even knowing if it's needed. I dont think the
> right way to prepair for a kernel is to use the hackerkernel as default for
> a unknown period of time before the expected stable release, the same apply on
> compilers!
then 2.4.x drivers won't be tested, then new gcc generated code'll never
be tested. Is this you want from us ?
whatever gcc-3 is availlable or not for 7.3/8, we'll provide a tested and
fixed gcc. in fact, gcc-2.95.3 may have more bugs that the new one ...
