Millions of electrons died to bring me this message. Was it worth it,
Guillaume Cottenceau?
> Alexander Skwar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > On Fri, Oct 13, 2000 at 02:37:10PM +0200, Guillaume Cottenceau wrote:
> > > ?????????????
> > >
> > > You should do a little bit of packaging before saying such <beep><beep>.
Sorry, I think there was a misunderstanding...
> 2. Do you know any distribution where they provide original source
> unpatched? There are simply not, the aim of a distribution is to
> provide some fixed (e.g. working) versions of the sources!!!
Absolutely. I approve of this policy, and I was attempting to point out a
flaw in the anti-2.96 movement. They claim that 2.96 is bad because it isn't
an official release, but they don't have a problem with non-official kernel
releases and the like. There's nothing wrong with not using an official
release -- in some ways, that's what open source is all about!
--
Graham Percival
