So sprach Aaron Cohen am Thu, Oct 19, 2000 at 10:57:10AM -0500: > I noticed that Udo has his netmask set to 255.255.240.0 are you sure that > that is correct, Uwe? Well, .240. IS a legal notation. If you take the private net from 172.16.0.0. to 172.32.0.0 you have the netmask 255.240.0.0. BUT I tried to setup a net with this netmask as well, and it did not work. dhclient kept on telling me that this is no legal netmask. Once I changed this to 255.255.0.0 dhclient was happy. Alexander Skwar -- Homepage: http://www.digitalprojects.com | http://www.dp.ath.cx Sichere Mail? Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED] fuer GnuPG Keys ICQ: 7328191
- [Cooker] still problems with dhcp Udo Weber
- Re: [Cooker] still problems with dhcp Florin Grad
- Re: [Cooker] still problems with dhcp Alexander Skwar
- Re: [Cooker] still problems with dhcp Aaron Cohen
- Re: [Cooker] still problems with dhcp Pierre Fortin
- Re: [Cooker] still problems with dhcp Alexander Skwar
- Re: [Cooker] still problems with dhc... Pierre Fortin
- Re: [Cooker] still problems with... Alexander Skwar
- Re: [Cooker] still problems ... Udo Weber
- Re: [Cooker] still problems ... Udo Weber
- Re: [Cooker] still problems ... Pierre Fortin
- Re: [Cooker] still problems with dhcp Florin Grad
- Re: [Cooker] still problems with dhcp Udo Weber
- Re: [Cooker] still problems with dhcp Udo Weber
- Re: [Cooker] still problems with dhc... ken garman
