Thanks, David.

--Doug

On Monday 13 November 2000 11:25, David Faure wrote:
> On Monday 13 November 2000 18:11, you wrote:
> > ----------  Forwarded Message  ----------
> > Subject: [Cooker] KDE2.0, Konquerqor bugs
> > Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2000 09:36:47 -0700
> > From: Doug Roberts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >
> > Hi, all.
> >
> > Question: is anybody working on Konqueror bugs? I submitted a bug report
> > to qa.mandrakesoft.com regarding Konqueror's inability to handle most
> > java appletts. The big report made it into the bugzilla database, and it
> > got assigned, but there doesn't seem to be any activity on the bug. I ask
> > because there are a lot of other Konqueror bugs, but I won't waste my
> > time reporting them if they are not being worked.
>
> Hello,
>
> unfortunately, you're reporting bugs at the wrong place.
> I'm in charge for Konqueror and I work at Mandrake, but I'm not in charge
> for _100%_ of konqueror. Please have a look at http://bugs.kde.org/
> for existing bug reports about konqueror. Those about java are classified
> under "kjava", and unfortunately I have no clue in this area.
> On the other hand, if you report bugs about konqueror's file management,
> network transparency, or overall framework, I'll answer your bug report
> myself. For HTML rendering and java/javascript, I have to rely on the
> corresponding authors.
>
> So, feel free to report more konqueror bugs, but only on
> http://bugs.kde.org (or using konqueror's bug report dialog), and after
> checking for duplicates in the existing reports (no point in spamming the
> developers with repetitions of the same bug report - this already happens
> too much).
>
> bugzilla should be used for Mandrake-specific bugs, not for KDE bugs.

-- 
==================================================================
Douglas Roberts, TSA-SA        |
Los Alamos National Laboratory | All good work is done in defiance
[EMAIL PROTECTED]                  |  of management. -- Bob Woodward
(505)667-4569                  |
==================================================================

Reply via email to