On Monday 13 November 2000 18:11, you wrote:
> ---------- Forwarded Message ----------
> Subject: [Cooker] KDE2.0, Konquerqor bugs
> Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2000 09:36:47 -0700
> From: Doug Roberts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
> Hi, all.
>
> Question: is anybody working on Konqueror bugs? I submitted a bug report to
> qa.mandrakesoft.com regarding Konqueror's inability to handle most java
> appletts. The big report made it into the bugzilla database, and it got
> assigned, but there doesn't seem to be any activity on the bug. I ask because
> there are a lot of other Konqueror bugs, but I won't waste my time reporting
> them if they are not being worked.
Hello,
unfortunately, you're reporting bugs at the wrong place.
I'm in charge for Konqueror and I work at Mandrake, but I'm not in charge
for _100%_ of konqueror. Please have a look at http://bugs.kde.org/
for existing bug reports about konqueror. Those about java are classified
under "kjava", and unfortunately I have no clue in this area.
On the other hand, if you report bugs about konqueror's file management,
network transparency, or overall framework, I'll answer your bug report
myself. For HTML rendering and java/javascript, I have to rely on the
corresponding authors.
So, feel free to report more konqueror bugs, but only on http://bugs.kde.org
(or using konqueror's bug report dialog), and after checking for duplicates
in the existing reports (no point in spamming the developers with repetitions
of the same bug report - this already happens too much).
bugzilla should be used for Mandrake-specific bugs, not for KDE bugs.
--
David FAURE, [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.mandrakesoft.com/~david/, http://www.konqueror.org/
KDE, Making The Future of Computing Available Today
See http://www.kde.org/kde1-and-kde2.html for how to set up KDE 2
