from the quill of Chmouel Boudjnah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on scroll <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > "Brian J. Murrell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > so you want remove bigmem for reiserfs ? Until the issues are worked out yes. Right now it's a tradeoff. You can have bigmem or reiserfs, but not both. I think with most of us on this list, resierfs is more important than bigmem. How many people here actually run systems that need bigmem support? Once the issues are worked out, we can turn bigmem support back on. How does that sound? b. -- Brian J. Murrell
- [Cooker] kernel-2.4.0 Chmouel Boudjnah
- Re: [Cooker] kernel-2.4.0 Robert L Martin
- Re: [Cooker] kernel-2.4.0 Chmouel Boudjnah
- [Cooker] kernel-2.4.0 or hackkernel Christian Gennerat
- Re: [Cooker] kernel-2.4.0 or hackkernel Chmouel Boudjnah
- Re: [Cooker] kernel-2.4.0 or hackkernel Brian J. Murrell
- Re: [Cooker] kernel-2.4.0 or hackkerne... Chmouel Boudjnah
- Re: [Cooker] kernel-2.4.0 or hack... Brian J. Murrell
- Re: [Cooker] kernel-2.4.0 or ... Chmouel Boudjnah
- Re: [Cooker] kernel-2.4.0... Brian J. Murrell
- Re: [Cooker] kernel-2.4.0 or hackkerne... Thierry Vignaud
- Re: [Cooker] kernel-2.4.0 or hack... Brian J. Murrell
- Re: [Cooker] kernel-2.4.0 or ... Thierry Vignaud
- Re: [Cooker] kernel-2.4.0 Christian Gennerat
- Re: [Cooker] kernel-2.4.0 Chmouel Boudjnah
- Re: [Cooker] kernel-2.4.0 Christian Gennerat
- Re: [Cooker] kernel-2.4.0 Chmouel Boudjnah
- Re: [Cooker] kernel-2.4.0 Christian Gennerat
