"Brian J. Murrell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Until the issues are worked out yes. Right now it's a tradeoff. You > can have bigmem or reiserfs, but not both. I think with most of us on > this list, resierfs is more important than bigmem. How many people here > actually run systems that need bigmem support? > > Once the issues are worked out, we can turn bigmem support back on. > > How does that sound? ugly, sorry. I could tell you that i know a lot of people (corporate=>big_money) who want the bigmem as well the reiserfs. -- MandrakeSoft Inc http://www.chmouel.org --Chmouel
- [Cooker] kernel-2.4.0 Chmouel Boudjnah
- Re: [Cooker] kernel-2.4.0 Robert L Martin
- Re: [Cooker] kernel-2.4.0 Chmouel Boudjnah
- [Cooker] kernel-2.4.0 or hackkernel Christian Gennerat
- Re: [Cooker] kernel-2.4.0 or hackkernel Chmouel Boudjnah
- Re: [Cooker] kernel-2.4.0 or hackkernel Brian J. Murrell
- Re: [Cooker] kernel-2.4.0 or hackkerne... Chmouel Boudjnah
- Re: [Cooker] kernel-2.4.0 or hack... Brian J. Murrell
- Re: [Cooker] kernel-2.4.0 or ... Chmouel Boudjnah
- Re: [Cooker] kernel-2.4.0... Brian J. Murrell
- Re: [Cooker] kernel-2.4.0 or hackkerne... Thierry Vignaud
- Re: [Cooker] kernel-2.4.0 or hack... Brian J. Murrell
- Re: [Cooker] kernel-2.4.0 or ... Thierry Vignaud
- Re: [Cooker] kernel-2.4.0 Christian Gennerat
- Re: [Cooker] kernel-2.4.0 Chmouel Boudjnah
- Re: [Cooker] kernel-2.4.0 Christian Gennerat
- Re: [Cooker] kernel-2.4.0 Chmouel Boudjnah
- Re: [Cooker] kernel-2.4.0 Christian Gennerat
- Re: [Cooker] kernel-2.4.0 Chmouel Boudjnah
