So sprach xaos am Sat, Nov 18, 2000 at 02:36:13PM -0500:
> On Saturday 18 November 2000 07:56, some strange person did etch this in
> > Sorry, but why do Drive Image and Ghost need support for a particular fs?
> because they're dos-based programs.
Well, yeah, but still: What do they need support for? If they can read the
disk, *DISK* (I'm not talking about the *FS* here) why should they need
support for a fs? As long as they can read the disk, they can do all they
need, even compression.
Alexander Skwar
--
How to quote: http://learn.to/quote (german) http://quote.6x.to (english)
Homepage: http://www.digitalprojects.com | http://www.dp.ath.cx
GnuPG ID: 59F6A6F5 FP: DC8AFA56C492EE6058D5 BAA62EEE3AD559F6A6F5
ICQ: 7328191 Uptime: 2 hours 0 minutes
