Xavier Bertou wrote:
> Well, I know people who were using ReiserFS for a big database and went
> back to ext2 and fscks because they had some problems (don't know more
Yeah, I hope they reportet all problems to the reiserfs
team. And besides, I know serveral web servers and db servers
running fine with reiserfs. So what?
> details). I heard Redhat doesn't plan to ship ReiserFS in 7.0 because it
> is not stable enough.
This Red Hat excuse it's not stable enough stinks!
They have some 'political' motivations for refusing
to support reiserfs. But it realy doesn't matter,
because I don't give a damn about what they do.
> Personnaly, I had some tests of ReiserFS on a hardware RAID system
ReiserFs and RAID makes problems. It is a known problem. Read
the reiserfs mailing list for more information. I dunno if it's
fixed now or not.
Cheers,
A.
