Xavier Bertou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Using gzip -9 instead of gzip ends with a 4% gain in time, 1% in space, > and a loss of 193% in time for compression. This is a large loss for such > a tool if you use it for Cooker, as you have to rebuild the database > every day or so ;-) you don't have to if you're using cooker as the only media ;p anyway, good point, i'll see with fpons... thanks, cu Pixel.
- [Cooker] RPMDrake Neville Cobb
- Re: [Cooker] RPMDrake Kai Graf
- [Cooker] rpmdrake Xavier Bertou
- Re: [Cooker] rpmdrake Pixel
- Re: [Cooker] rpmdrake Xavier Bertou
- Re: [Cooker] rpmdrake Pixel
- Re: [Cooker] rpmdrake Fran�ois Pons
- Re: [Cooker] rpmdrake R.I.P. Deaddog
- [Cooker] rpmdrake Derek Wildstar
- [Cooker] rpmdrake Rui Barreiros
- [Cooker] rpmdrake Mike Graham
- [Cooker] rpmdrake Mike Graham
- RE: [Cooker] rpmdrake Samuel Penning
- [Cooker] rpmdrake Rene Schumann
- Re: [Cooker] rpmdrake Borsenkow Andrej
- Re: [Cooker] rpmdrake François Pons
