I have seen articles going in both directions. I would be inclinedto
believe that FreeBSD was the superior OS, if only because of it's age...
but I do think Linux is coming up (in comparison) faster than a
skindiver out of breath...
Shannon
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Should be this one - read
> http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-kernel&m=98347493206995&w=2
>
> > Shannon Matteson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > > Joshman, I heartily agree that the BSD is currently more scalable, but
> > > the point of (or one of the points of) Linux Mandrake is ease of use,
> > > and to switch kernels would be so huge a setback for the distro that you
> > > might as well start at 1.0. It would indeed be a step backwards, not
> > > only for the developers of LM, but for consistency and probably ease of
> > > use, as well. Of course, I am far from an expert, so I am quite
> > > possibly wrong.
> > >
> > > Sure, *BSD is more stable. But Linux and *BSD are separate for a
> > > reason, methinks. If you like *BSD, then use *BSD! If you wanna use
> > > both, use VMWare!
> >
> >
> > for all of you who doubt if BSD is better that linux you may have to
> > checkout the (recent) thread on the lkml about that :
> >
> > http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-kernel&m=98341027108236&w=2
> >
> > --
> > MandrakeSoft Inc http://www.chmouel.org
> > --Chmouel
> >
>
> --
> Prana <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> http://www.cyest.org
> My GnuPG Key ID: 0x33343FD3 (2000-07-21)
> Key fingerprint = F1FB 1F76 8866 0F40 A801 D9DA 6BED 6641 3334 3FD3
> http://blackhole.pca.dfn.de:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x33343FD3
>
> Sent through GMX FreeMail - http://www.gmx.net
