----- Original Message -----
From: "J . A . Magallon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, March 29, 2001 4:24 PM
Subject: Re: [Cooker] GRUB...Why is it a dependency of base system (i.e why
can't it be removed?)


>
> On 03.29 R.I.P. Deaddog wrote:
> >
> > This issue has been brought up before, and somebody (I forgot the name)
> > suggested that basesystem requires a virtual package called "bootloader"
> > or something like that instead of requiring both lilo and grub. And then
> > nobody followed up. Period.
> >
>
> It was me (at least one). If you are short of / or /boot partitions space,
> like me, just rpm -e --force grub. You can live without it.
>
> --
> J.A. Magallon                                          #  Let the source
> mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]                              #  be with you,
Luke...
>
> Linux werewolf 2.4.2-ac28 #1 SMP Thu Mar 29 16:41:17 CEST 2001 i686

Wish I could, take a look at this :(
[root@littlebox /root]# rpm -e --force grub
Macro %_install_langs has empty body
rpm: only installation, upgrading, rmsource and rmspec may be forced
[root@littlebox /root]# rpm --version
Macro %_install_langs has empty body
RPM version 4.0
[root@littlebox /root]#

BTW, how can I fix that damn macro problem?



Reply via email to