On Sun, Apr 29, 2001 at 09:51:03PM +0200, Alexander Skwar wrote: > No, it's not!!! No telnet-server is good (maybe), but why exclude the > client? Not every server is telnet enabled, you know. Telnetclient is of cause usefull (for server testing: 119, 25, etc.). -- Und Tsch�ss. Stefan ### Kilroy was here ### 5803 10:40pm up 38 days
- Re: [Cooker] excellent! no kdebase-nsplugin... Tim
- Re: [Cooker] excellent! no kdebase-nsplugin... Sarang Lakare
- Re: [Cooker] excellent! no kdebase-nsp... Pixel
- Re: [Cooker] excellent! no kdebase... Terrible Tom
- Re: [Cooker] excellent! no kde... Shalrath
- Re: [Cooker] excellent! no kdebase... Jose
- Re: [Cooker] excellent! no kde... Pixel
- [Cooker] Tuxracer depends ... Alessandro Ronchi (Zoddo->)
- Re: [Cooker] excellent! no kde... Alexander Skwar
- Re: [Cooker] excellent! no... Xavier Bertou
- Re: [Cooker] excellent! no... Stefan Hu�feldt
- Re: [Cooker] excellen... Alexander Skwar
- RE: [Cooker] excellent! no kdebase-nsplugin... Don Head
- Re: [Cooker] excellent! no kdebase-nsp... Guillaume Cottenceau
- Re: [Cooker] excellent! no kdebase... Thierry Vignaud
- Re: [Cooker] Install everything (w... Wesley Hertlein
- Re: [Cooker] Install everythin... Robert L Martin
- Re: [Cooker] Install every... Blue Lizard
- Re: [Cooker] excellent! no kdebase-nsp... Peter Ruskin
- RE: [Cooker] excellent! no kdebase-nsplugin... Don Head
- RE: [Cooker] excellent! no kdebase-nsplugin... Don Head
