So sprach andre am Sun, May 20, 2001 at 11:05:05PM -0400: > Almost all softmodems are "supported" under linux. You just have to run an > old kernel so seeing if it is linux supported is not sufficiant ? Why are old kernels better in supporting winmodems than new ones? And, how old is old enough? 2.0? Alexander Skwar -- How to quote: http://learn.to/quote (german) http://quote.6x.to (english) Homepage: http://www.digitalprojects.com | http://www.iso-top.de iso-top.de - Die g�nstige Art an Linux Distributionen zu kommen Uptime: 6 days 10 hours 24 minutes
- Re: [Cooker] Where to get g77 for Mandra... J . A . Magallon
- Re: [Cooker] Where to get g77 for Mandrake 8.0? Yves Duret
- [Cooker] winmodem? 8.0? Mohamed L'H�di ZAHER
- Re: [Cooker] winmodem? 8.0? Geoffrey Lee
- Re: [Cooker] winmodem? 8.0? Tom Massey
- Re: [Cooker] winmodem? 8.0? Robert L Martin
- Re: [Cooker] winmodem? 8.0? Gary Lawrence Murphy
- Re: [Cooker] winmodem? 8.0? Hoyt
- Re: [Cooker] winmodem? 8.0? Charles A. Shirley
- Re: [Cooker] winmodem? 8.0? andre
- Re: [Cooker] winmodem? 8.0? Alexander Skwar
- Re: [Cooker] winmodem? 8.0? Tom Massey
- Re: [Cooker] winmodem? 8.0? andre
- Re: [Cooker] winmodem? 8.0? Terrible Tom
- Re: [Cooker] winmodem? 8.0? Gary Lawrence Murphy
- Re: [Cooker] winmodem? 8.0? Hoyt
- Re: [Cooker] winmodem? 8.0? Robert L Martin
