On Sun, 20 May 2001, SI Reasoning wrote: > I think what he was talking about was... instead of > going public with an ipo, have mandrake be a > user/developer owned company with the ability to buy > into the company that you are also putting effort > into. Sounds like a good idea to me. What is the legal status of Mandrake as a company? If it's the equivalent of what in the UK is a private limited company, then it could offer shares for sale to developers (but not to the general public), AFAIK. Michael
- Re: [Cooker] Eazel services picked ... Blue Lizard
- Re: [Cooker] Eazel services picked up and expand... Armisis Aieoln
- Re: [Cooker] Eazel services picked up and ex... SI Reasoning
- Re: [Cooker] Eazel services picked up an... Alexander Skwar
- Re: [Cooker] Eazel services picked ... Roland Nagtegaal
- Re: [Cooker] Eazel services picked ... Tim
- Re: [Cooker] Eazel services picked ... SI Reasoning
- Re: [Cooker] Eazel services picked up and expanded by Man... John J. Allen
- Re: [Cooker] Eazel services picked up and expanded b... Alexander Skwar
- Re: [Cooker] Eazel services picked up and expand... SI Reasoning
- Re: [Cooker] Eazel services picked up and ex... Michael Brown
- Re: [Cooker] Eazel services picked up an... Armisis Aieoln
- Re: [Cooker] Eazel services picked ... michael
- Re: [Cooker] Eazel services picked ... SI Reasoning
- Re: [Cooker] Eazel services picked ... michael
- Re: [Cooker] Eazel services picked ... Armisis Aieoln
- Re: [Cooker] Eazel services picked ... Michael Brown
- Re: [Cooker] Eazel services picked ... michael
- Re: [Cooker] Eazel services picked ... Blue Lizard
- Re: [Cooker] Eazel services picked ... Armisis Aieoln
- Re: [Cooker] Eazel services picked ... Blue Lizard
