On Thu, 24 May 2001, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > I use framebuffer with GF2MX for a long time without any problems. > > OK, good to know. (you are talking about rivafb not vesafb, right?) > Dunno. I just set vga=788 and live with the result. I suspect, it is vesafb, right. So, what the difference? (I mean, what I get by using rivafb that vesafb does not have?) -andrej
- [Cooker] What do you suggest between Matrox and NVidi... Claudio
- Re: [Cooker] What do you suggest between Matrox ... Arnd Bergmann
- RE: [Cooker] What do you suggest between Mat... Andrej Borsenkow
- RE: [Cooker] What do you suggest between... Arnd Bergmann
- RE: [Cooker] What do you suggest bet... Andrej Borsenkow
- RE: [Cooker] What do you suggest between... Sebastian Dransfeld
- Re: [Cooker] What do you suggest between... J . A . Magallon
- Re: [Cooker] What do you suggest between Mat... Guillaume Rousse
- Re: [Cooker] What do you suggest between... Arnd Bergmann
- Re: [Cooker] What do you suggest between Matrox ... Andreas Simon
- Re: [Cooker] What do you suggest between Mat... Guillaume Cottenceau
