On Tuesday 05 June 2001 11:03 am, Arnd Bergmann pointed out:
> On Tue, 5 Jun 2001, frank wrote:
> > On Tuesday 05 June 2001 01:29 am, Vincent Meyer wrote:
> > > On Tuesday 05 June 2001 12:47 pm, you wrote:
> > > > hmmm...it seems to have done an admirable job of changing the
> > > > date on all existing packages to today's date (june 5), but i
> > > > do not yet find that it is carrying the packages updated since
> > > > june 1...
> > >
> > > yes, and at least as far as Netscape reports, is June 5 of 2000
> > > NOT 2001 ???
> >
> > odd...i'm reading 2001 here...
>
> It's a problem with certain ftp servers and some browsers. The dates
> are not shown correctly and can be anything.
> On Konqueror 2.0.1, the dates are between June 1 and July 1 in both
> 2000 and 2001, appearantly it does not know norwegian months and sets
> them all to June.
> If you use plain ftp, all the dates are correct.
>
> Rsync, however, also seems to get some dates wrong, so you might
> want to use the --size-only option to get a faster sync when
> the mirror is complete again.
>
> Right now (20:00 GMT), it is still waiting for gdb-5.0-13mdk.src.rpm
> and has not yet started the binary RPMs AFAICS.
>
> Arnd <><
I am using straight ftp (ie a script running from cmd line) on my 
cooker updating and I have all (remaining) rpm files reporting Monday 
June 5 2000. Which means I will have to update every file when/ if 
there is an actual update. Using metered broadband this can add up.
Should I use a different server? Currently sunsite.uio.no.

-- 
-m-

Reply via email to