So sprach Todd Richmond am Fri, Jun 08, 2001 at 06:42:28PM -0700:
> Any ideas (including a better config)?
Yep. Also split the SWAP parition into two 100 MB partitions and place them
on both disks
100 MB SWAP disk1
100 MB SWAP disk2
In /etc/fstab, make sure that both SWAPs are mounted with the same priority.
This way, you'll get another performance increase as the kernel does 'RAID0'
on the swaps automatically in this case.
Alexander Skwar
--
How to quote: http://learn.to/quote (german) http://quote.6x.to (english)
Homepage: http://www.digitalprojects.com | http://www.iso-top.de
iso-top.de - Die g�nstige Art an Linux Distributionen zu kommen
Uptime: 1 day 8 hours 57 minutes
- [Cooker] Failure to start X after XFree86-4.1.0-1mdk Ivan Kerekes
- Re: [Cooker] Failure to start X after XFree86-4.1.0-1... David Durham
- Re: [Cooker] Failure to start X after XFree86-4.1... andre
- [Cooker] XFree86-4.1.0-1mdk and Xinerama Bryan Opfer
- Re: [Cooker] XFree86-4.1.0-1mdk and Xiner... Bryan Opfer
- Re: [Cooker] XFree86-4.1.0-1mdk and ... Arnd Bergmann
- [Cooker] RAID creation fails Todd Richmond
- Re: [Cooker] RAID creation f... Alexander Skwar
- Re: [Cooker] RAID creation f... Todd Richmond
- Re: [Cooker] XFree86-4.1.0-1mdk ... Bryan Opfer
- Re: [Cooker] XFree86-4.1.0-1... Frederic Lepied
- Re: [Cooker] XFree86-4.1.0-1... Bryan Opfer
- Re: [Cooker] Failure to start X after XFree86-4.1.0-1... David Durham
- Re: [Cooker] Failure to start X after XFree86-4.1... St�phane Genaud
- Re: [Cooker] Failure to start X after XFree86... St�phane Genaud
- Re: [Cooker] Failure to start X after XFr... Ivan Kerekes
