"Brian J. Murrell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > without devfsd, the amount of work to do is quite large ... > > So then include devfsd as well. Problem solved. :-) nope. this'll still broke tools that parse /proc/*
- [Cooker] devfs support Guillaume Rousse
- Re: [Cooker] devfs support Chmouel Boudjnah
- Re: [Cooker] devfs support Guillaume Rousse
- Re: [Cooker] devfs support Sebastian Dransfeld
- [Cooker] devfs support Andrej Borsenkow
- Re: [Cooker] devfs support Thierry Vignaud
- Re: [Cooker] devfs support Alexander Skwar
- Re: [Cooker] devfs support Thierry Vignaud
- [Cooker] Re: devfs support Brian J. Murrell
- Re: [Cooker] devfs support Thierry Vignaud
- Re: [Cooker] devfs support Andrej Borsenkow
- Re: [Cooker] devfs support Chmouel Boudjnah
- Re: [Cooker] devfs suppo... J�rgen Zimmermann
- Re: [Cooker] devfs suppo... Chmouel Boudjnah
