S N <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Actually... I can do a NFS install, I could also
> download the ISO and install from a partition, I could
> probably bring the files over one by one. But my
> personal choice is to FTP install. It's a standard,
> and probably the way most people without a cdrom
> install.
We could make a poll. I think the HD install would be very well rated from
this ML, since FTP installs from the net are slow and somewhat not very
efficient (connection can stop during install...). Internal testings are
done 99% using NFS apart just before new releases.
> At the same time I doubt businesses are going to buy a
> large amount of Pentium 133mhz 22mb machines so not
> supporting a low ram install is fine. Just make sure
> to provide documentation on alternate install routes.
Nice.
> Ps. I'm not sure you really read what I write.
>
> I do read what you write, I just feel there should be
> some way to FTP install on a low ram computer. I also
> understand that certain sacrifices occur during the
> install (This is what I would like to learn more
> about).
That is fine; but keep saying that we need to fix a bug in the installer
is exactly opposite to what I tried to tell you; hence the supposition
that you didn't really read what I wrote.
--
Guillaume Cottenceau - http://mandrakesoft.com/~gc/
