Ainsi parlait Fran�ois Pons :
> Guillaume Rousse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > Effectively, that could be a good idea but some times you will get
> > > contrib packages, ie package that need tweaking to run.
> >
> > As Mesa 3.5, for instance :-)
> > Why not a warning in urpmi then ?
>
> We have to make difference between contrib and non contrib, there is
> already difference between update and other. Maybe considering cooker as
> update will help :-)
>
> Another solution is to rename Mesa as hackMesa, because this is somewhat
> better not to have the same package in contrib and main with different
> version.
I was not talking about the specific Mesa case, but more generaly the
possibility of providing a hdlist.cz for contribs, or other alternative
package repository.
This way, urpmi would prevent the user the soon-to-be-installed package is
not officialy supported, and should be considered as experimental.
--
Guillaume Rousse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
GPG keys http://www.univ-reunion.fr/~grousse/gpgkeys.html
