So sprach Eugenio Diaz am Mon, Jul 09, 2001 at 11:53:59AM -0700: > Is cooker again leaving the reply-to field untouched in emails? Nope, it's not. In your mail, Reply-To: was set correctly, ie. to the list. > I think is bad that every time you reply to a maillist post, you have to double > check that the reply-to address is cooker and not the address of the poster. Right, it's bad. Alexander Skwar -- How to quote: http://learn.to/quote (german) http://quote.6x.to (english) Homepage: http://www.digitalprojects.com | http://www.iso-top.de iso-top.de - Die g�nstige Art an Linux Distributionen zu kommen Uptime: 7 hours 12 minutes
- Re: [Cooker] Reply-To field Digital Wokan
- Re: [Cooker] Reply-To field Eugenio Diaz
- Re: [Cooker] Reply-To field Randy Kramer
- Re: [Cooker] Reply-To field Alexander Skwar
- RE: [Cooker] Reply-To field Eugenio Diaz
- Re: [Cooker] Reply-To field Randy Kramer
- Re: [Cooker] Reply-To field Eugenio Diaz
- Re: [Cooker] Reply-To field Randy Kramer
- Re: [Cooker] Reply-To field David Walluck
- Re: [Cooker] Reply-To field Eugenio Diaz
- Re: [Cooker] Reply-To field Alexander Skwar
- Re: [Cooker] Reply-To field Christian Bricart
- Re: [Cooker] Reply-To field Alexander Skwar
- Re: [Cooker] Reply-To field Eugenio Diaz
- Re: [Cooker] Reply-To field Eugenio Diaz
- [OT] Re: [Cooker] Reply-To field Xavier Bertou
- Re: [OT] Re: [Cooker] Reply-To field Alexander Skwar
- Re: [Cooker] Reply-To field andre
- Re: [Cooker] Reply-To field Eugenio Diaz
- Re: [Cooker] Reply-To field Ben Reser
- Re: [Cooker] Reply-To field David Walluck
