On Tue, Jul 10, 2001 at 08:32:47AM +0200, Alexander Skwar wrote: > So sprach Eugenio Diaz am Mon, Jul 09, 2001 at 11:53:59AM -0700: > > Is cooker again leaving the reply-to field untouched in emails? > > Nope, it's not. In your mail, Reply-To: was set correctly, ie. to the list. And that's _not_ correct.. http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html Christian -- Things that make you go "Hmmm": "If a train station is where the train stops, what is a workstation?"
- Re: [Cooker] Reply-To field Eugenio Diaz
- Re: [Cooker] Reply-To field Randy Kramer
- Re: [Cooker] Reply-To field Alexander Skwar
- RE: [Cooker] Reply-To field Eugenio Diaz
- Re: [Cooker] Reply-To field Randy Kramer
- Re: [Cooker] Reply-To field Eugenio Diaz
- Re: [Cooker] Reply-To field Randy Kramer
- Re: [Cooker] Reply-To field David Walluck
- Re: [Cooker] Reply-To field Eugenio Diaz
- Re: [Cooker] Reply-To field Alexander Skwar
- Re: [Cooker] Reply-To field Christian Bricart
- Re: [Cooker] Reply-To field Alexander Skwar
- Re: [Cooker] Reply-To field Eugenio Diaz
- Re: [Cooker] Reply-To field Eugenio Diaz
- [OT] Re: [Cooker] Reply-To field Xavier Bertou
- Re: [OT] Re: [Cooker] Reply-To field Alexander Skwar
- Re: [Cooker] Reply-To field andre
- Re: [Cooker] Reply-To field Eugenio Diaz
- Re: [Cooker] Reply-To field Ben Reser
- Re: [Cooker] Reply-To field David Walluck
- Re: [Cooker] Reply-To field Alexander Skwar
