Guillaume Rousse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Uhhhha !
> >
> > This is a library package, containing .so files, split the packages with
> > the library in one and the other file in another. This has been done to
> > allow multiple libraries (different version).
> >
> > You could get a libbibtex1 package (or libpybliographer1) maybe ?
> Done, thanks.
> Now i have a shorter error message for /usr/lib/pybliographer dir, but i
> imagine changing this name would turns the soft in error
> [guillaume@silbermann guillaume]$ rpmlint
> rpm/RPMS/i586/libpybliographer1-1.0.9-3mdk.i586.rpm
> E: libpybliographer1 non-versioned-file-in-library-package
> /usr/lib/pybliographer/_recodemodule.so
> E: libpybliographer1 non-versioned-file-in-library-package
> /usr/lib/pybliographer/_bibtexmodule.so
> E: libpybliographer1 non-versioned-file-in-library-package
> /usr/lib/pybliographer
These file may not be left in the library package because they may be module
used by the tools itself ? This is not a standard library directory (as /usr/lib
or /lib or /usr/X11R6/lib ...) and the filename is not standard too for a
runtime library. So it may be a better place to put them in the other package.
This will effectively remove the error, but does any other package need these
files ?
Fran�ois.
