On Sun, 12 Aug 2001, Pedro Rosa wrote: > I didn't really get this one. Why is the rpm of libgcj for gcc 3.0 > demanding the libgcj rpm of the old and the apparently "dismissed" 2.96? /usr/lib/libgcjgc.so.1 /usr/lib/libgcjgc.so.1.0.1 /usr/lib/libzgcj.so.0 /usr/lib/libzgcj.so.0.0.0 Provided by libgcj-2.96 thus enabling both compilers (2.96 and 3.0.1) to coexist.
