Re: [Cooker] what am I supposed to be doing with devfs these days?

[Borsenkow Andrej]

Will Smith wrote:
> Le Mercredi 15 Ao�t 2001 09:42, vous avez �crit :
> 
>>I am confused.  devfs has been staunchly rejected by the Cooker team
>>in the past.  Now devfsd is a requirement of the latest kernels.  Are
>>up-to-date Cooker machines supposed to be using devfs[d] or not?
>>
> 
> If you don't want to use DevFS, remove the devfsd package :
> $]$ rpm -e --nodeps devfsd
> 
> normally everything will be fine.
>

You can't remoce devfsd because it is requires by kernel. If you do not 
want to use devfs do not mount it. Very simple. It is not mounted by 
default so almost the only difference between old and new kernel is 
/proc/partitions that is using new names even if devfs is not mounted.

Or does new kernel mount devfs by default?
-andrej