OK. You can of course do that. Didn't consider that option. The only
drawback, though, is that ACPI bloats the kernel by 120K.
On Thu, 23 Aug 2001, Borsenkow Andrej wrote:
>
> > No. If you compile in support for ACPI it gets precedence over APM :-(
> > (ACPI is not available as a module).
> >
>
> Have you really tested it? I did and it works. If you compile in both
> and specify noacpi command-line kernel option ACPI is not started. And
> (I have currently no kernel sources) I bet it can be made default.
>
> -andrej
>
> >
> > On Wed, 22 Aug 2001, SI Reasoning wrote:
> >
> > > Could acpid be included in the kernel and let us
> > > choose which module to use?
> > >
> > > --- Eivind Eriksen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > On 22 Aug 2001, Chmouel Boudjnah wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > "Chris Edwards" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > > >
> > > > > > There's a new acpid:
> > > > >
> > > > > well that doen't change anything since we don't
> > > > use acpid
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > well, I do - after I compile the kernel my self.
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > =====
> > > SI Reasoning
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > gnupg/pgp key id 035213BC
> > >
> > > __________________________________________________
> > > Do You Yahoo!?
> > > Make international calls for as low as $.04/minute with Yahoo!
> Messenger
> > > http://phonecard.yahoo.com/
>
>
