Gr�goire Colbert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...]
> previous message, you wrote that the signal was SIGSEGV, and here, the
> main process quits gracefully (exit(0)). That's odd.
process starts
it forks
one is the monitoring process
the other one is the "real" one
when the real one terminates, the monitoring process examines the signal
or error code. if there is something interesting, it prints it (prints
"received signal 11")
then the monitoring process exits gracefully with error code 0
this may be a bit more complex than that, but this is the relevant part.
--
Guillaume Cottenceau - http://people.mandrakesoft.com/~gc/
