>
> Le Mardi 18 Septembre 2001 15:15, Borsenkow Andrej scribit :
> > I hope you won't put this in RC1 announcement (but am afraid it is
too
> > late already). Instead it were better to explain that for stability
> > reasons this time it is *not* the latest kernel available ...
>
> the latest kernel is not the more stable.
> first : the min/max problem that may break some drivers.
> second : remember the 2.4.3 with the new aic7xxx that break some SCSI
> adaptor.
> third : the 2.4.9 emu10k1 drivers was buggy ( wine didn't work ).
> When you know the way the 2.4.9 has been release ...
>
> maybe you want to read this ?
> http://kt.zork.net/kernel-traffic/back-issues.html
>
> However I think that the 2.4.10 will be stable and good. I'd
forecasted
> for
> the 2.4.10/11 and then the beginning of the 2.5 serie.
>
What do you want to say with your reply? I just said that if
announcement for RC1 will state "the latest kernel" it will be wrong (it
states this for beta3 where it was incorrect already). And announcement
better explain why kernel is not the latest. That is all. What exactly
do you try to argue?
