Borsenkow Andrej wrote: > The same partitioning and file system types?
I installed the rh on a 5 GB partition, where I earlier had Cooker. All my Cookers, two now, are reiserfs, but the rh is an ext3. > How is it different from Mandrake? rpm -i inserts new kernel into > bootloader config (at least for lilo, there may be specific bug for > grub) and subsequent rpm -Fvh ignores new version because it already > installed. I have only run a kernel update once on a Cooker, just for a test, and used a -Uvh. From memory this cleared the old kernel, but wrote correctly to grub about the new one. My rh -Fvh clearly showed that it cleared out the old headers - the used upgrade does not save an idiot, here is the rh boot directory. boot.b kernel.h-2.4.9 System.map@ chain.b message System.map-2.4.7-10 grub/ module-info@ System.map-2.4.9-7 initrd-2.4.7-10.img module-info-2.4.7-10 vmlinuz@ initrd-2.4.9-7.img module-info-2.4.9-7 vmlinuz-2.4.7-10 kernel.h@ os2_d.b vmlinuz-2.4.9-7 > Apart from that I would be interested in comparison between Mdk > (cooker/8.1) and RH7.2. I don't know about what tests to tun, I only installed it to check out the burned CD's for my sons - they prefere rh. Besides I have never installed Mdk8.1, as I have had small problems with kudzu and devfs most of the time. regards guran -- Mandrake Linux 8.2 Cooker kernel-2.4.12-1mdk per-10-16-0748
