le jeu 15-11-2001 � 12:05, Juan Quintela a �crit : > >>>>> "fabrice" == Fabrice FACORAT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > fabrice> le lun 12-11-2001 � 09:40, Blue Lizard a �crit : > >> Borsenkow Andrej wrote: > >> > >> >Is it released? > >> > > >> >>Who will be maintaining it now (when), and will you ensure (TTBOYA) > >> >>peaceful coexistence with (standard issue) kernel? > >> >>This is mainly a matter of proper installkernel-age. > >> >> > >> > > >> >And will it finally be possible to have two kernel sources side by side? > >> > > >> >-andrej > >> > > >> > > >> ooooh, that's a good one. Thanks for bringing it up. > > fabrice> I don't see the point. if you do rpm -ivh > fabrice> kernel-source.whateveryouwant.rpm, you can install several kernel-source > fabrice> package side by side but : > fabrice> + /usr/src/linux will point to only one > fabrice> + kernel-headers will overlap previous so in fact you can only have one > fabrice> kernel-header at the same time. Unless we use the same idea. > fabrice> /usr/include/linux -> /usr/include/linux-2.x.y > > That will be fixed, kernel-source package needs to be rethought > (kernel-headers needs to dissapear and be included in glibc),
what ? glibc ? Do you mean that files in kernel-headers never change ? Upgrade my whole glibc just to match my kernel version seems to be a pain. On top of that I believed that glibc developer didn't want to be too linux specific ? you're going to be flame by RMS : lol > think that you are right that it should be possible to install two > kernel-sources at the same time. we can, just have to make an install ( -ivh and not an upgrade ( -Uvh ) but /usr/src/linux always point to one kernel at a time. > Later, Juan. > > > -- > In theory, practice and theory are the same, but in practice they > are different -- Larry McVoy > -- http://perso.wanadoo.fr/linux_wizard/index.html - Il ne faut pas frapper un homme a terre. Il faut lui donner des coups de pieds; ca evite de se baisser.
