1. SuSE doesn't allow to download the 6 CDs anyway, 2. If you check the last time it was updated, you'll see that gtk-gnutella wasn't updated for over one year and a half. Long development cycle :-). If you compare those two, you'll get the feeling that napshare took gtk-gnutella's source and went on with development (not sure though if this is possible), anyway, it is more comfortable as anyone who has used will tell you. My idea is opening space for much needed programs. Just because LM8.1 changed to three CDs instead of two doesn't mean we need to put "deprecated" software inside contrib.... that's MHO...
> SuSE proved that you can make a 6 CD Linux distro. Why cut Mandrake > down? (Not that I want to download 6 .iso files.) > > Marcio Cordero wrote: > > >Just a short note: > >as far as I can see, napshare (napshare.sourceforge.net) seems to be > >gtk-gnutellas's successor. Shouldn't gtk-gnutella be dropped (since it > doesn't seem > >to be in dev anymore) and use napshare instead? The same applies to gsx, > it > >doesn't seem to be in development anymore. Maybe we could free up more > space > >on contrib branch for new packages dropping packages that have a new > >development name or that are useless (anyone using gsx out there)? Just a > thought... > >Greetings, > >Marcio > > > > > -- GMX - Die Kommunikationsplattform im Internet. http://www.gmx.net
