[root@mom root]# tune2fs -l /dev/hdb2
tune2fs 1.24a (02-Sep-2001)'mom,10.0.0.77' (RSA1) to
the list of known hosts.
Filesystem volume name:   <none>
Last mounted on:          <not available>
Filesystem UUID:         
ca78be02-e630-11d4-938c-ff1614a77075
Filesystem magic number:  0xEF53
Filesystem revision #:    1 (dynamic)
Filesystem features:      has_journal filetype
needs_recovery sparse_super
Filesystem state:         clean
Errors behavior:          Continue
Filesystem OS type:       Linux
Inode count:              383232
Block count:              766080
Reserved block count:     38304
Free blocks:              157039
Free inodes:              239356
First block:              0
Block size:               4096
Fragment size:            4096
Blocks per group:         32768
Fragments per group:      32768
Inodes per group:         15968
Inode blocks per group:   499
Last mount time:          Sun Nov 25 23:17:43 2001
Last write time:          Sun Nov 25 23:17:43 2001
Mount count:              18
Maximum mount count:      20
Last checked:             Sun Nov 25 01:32:20 2001
Check interval:           15552000 (6 months)
Next check after:         Fri May 24 02:32:20 2002
Reserved blocks uid:      0 (user root)
Reserved blocks gid:      0 (group root)
First inode:              11
Inode size:               128
Journal UUID:             <none>
Journal inode:            8
Journal device:           0x0000
First orphan inode:       368873

--- Juan Quintela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>>>> "george" == George Mitchell
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> 
> george> SI Reasoning wrote:
> >> potential "uniqueness":
> >> - 2 disk system with /boot on hda2 and / on hdb2
> >> - upgraded mdk7.2 to 8.1
> >> - migrated from ext2 to ext3 (previous kernel)
> >> - k6-2 400 cpu (in case it is an amd chipset
> issue)
> >> 
> george> I am using k6-2 450 so you can eliminate
> that factor, but I find the
> george> fact that you upgraded from ext2
> interesting.  I wonder if the result
> george> is the same as a clean ext3 install or if
> there is some sort of
> george> kudging involved?  / and /boot on separate
> drives could be confusing
> george> something I suppose and the fact that you
> went the upgrade route and
> george> not the clean install route, well upgrades
> are notorious for wierd
> george> problems but I think a connection with disk
> audit problems would be
> george> unlikely, assuming your initscripts is
> current for 8.1.  Hopefully
> george> someone on the list can spot some pattern
> here and come up with a
> george> solution.
> 
> Hi
>         Let me guess:
> - 7.2 uses as kernel 2.2.
> - there is a way to generate a kernel in 2.2 & 2.4
> making the fs
>   incompatible with 2.2 (I think that it is the
> sparse super
>         capability).
> 
> could you check/sent me the output of:
> 
> tune2fs -l <your partition>
> 
> please?
> 
> Later, Juan.
> 
> -- 
> In theory, practice and theory are the same, but in
> practice they 
> are different -- Larry McVoy
> 


=====
SI Reasoning
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve 
neither liberty nor safety." 
Benjamin Franklin

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! GeoCities - quick and easy web site hosting, just $8.95/month.
http://geocities.yahoo.com/ps/info1

Reply via email to