Oden Eriksson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > On Mondayen den 3 December 2001 15.23, Han wrote: >> Oden Eriksson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>> Being a big qmail-fan myself who prefers to do it all manually I >> can't be of much assistance since I got it like I want it. > You don't have the means or time to try it out? Hmm well my qmail servers are running on OpenBSD :] > I can asure you vpopmail and qmailadmin does a wonderful job. I have > used this combination for a long time because it's very easy for the > end customer. Sounds great. I an have a look at it. I mean qmail is great except for end users. We don't want to give the former NT-admins an excuse :D Just a silly question, cause I could look it up. Is it _secure_? >> But I can imagine not everybody likes to make a real study of the >> software. >> Btw. Have you allready had a look at this project? Seems to be less >> risky in case of licensing situations. >> http://freshmeat.net/projects/qinstall/ > Yes I have, and I have also suggested something like this to dodge > the "DJB license" for Mandrake. Since it's the end user patching > and compiling, it could be a way. I fully agree to the DJB license. I mean this code has the remarkable record of being exploit free and that is really a big achievement in this era of computer-science. And I respect that. So lets do it his way. Who are we to critizise this man? qinstall seems to need python. Seems to work on OpenBSD. nice. I happen to trust portable code better. Here is another one. http://www.qmailtheeasyway.com/ I told this author month ago that doing: rpm -q qmail is not the smartest way to test if qmail is installed ;) Seems to have made progress as well. What on earth does it have to be 18.3 mb for, lets have a look. OMG they are nuts. They even want to install rblsmtp and have .... Ahem... never mind. I would prefer to see a decent sh ( not bash ) script that wgets the tarballz and just install everything according to the manual. dependencies are gcc and groff. I see the design in my head :) Cya, Han.
