On Sunday 09 December 2001 09:16 pm, you wrote:
> Leon Brooks ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > On Monday 10 December 2001 07:53, Han wrote:
> >> Hoyt Duff ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> >>> On Sunday 09 December 2001 04:22 pm, you wrote:
> >>>> Yura Gusev ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> >>>>> Hi, is it possible to move Konqueror and KDM from kdebase to the
> >>>>> seperate packages?
> >>>>
> >>>> /me thinks konqueoror resembles IE from this viewpoint.
> >>>
> >>> As does Netscape to me, but make it look different if it bothers
> >>> you; you have plenty of configuration options.
> >>
> >> What I meant is that konqueror is the default browser for kde and
> >> that you can't get konqueror with out kde nor kde without
> >> konqueror.
> >
> > Konqueror and KMail run fine for me under Enlightenment, Gnome and
> > BlackBox. Conversely, Galeon and Evolution seem happy under KDE. As
> > long as everyone has enough libraries, there doesn't seem to be a
> > problem. Maybe you need to get out and about more?
>
> You know what I meant. You need to install more that 100MB of
> libraries. Nearly the complete kde set. You can't get konqueror for
> lets say 2-4 MB.
1. KDE is only 100 MB when it's built with debug symbols. A more typical size
would be baout 1/4th of that, with half being kdelibs.
2. Konqueror by itself is pretty much only a thin shell between KIO and
kparts.
It's useless without much of kdebase:
To be able to configure it you need kcontrol, at the very least kcm_shell
To be able to use HTTP, Etc., you need kioslaves,
To be able to view text files, you need the Kate part,
etc.
