On Mon, Jan 21, 2002 at 10:38:01PM +0800, Leon Brooks wrote:
> On Monday 21 January 2002 19:00, Geoffrey Lee wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 21, 2002 at 02:22:16PM +0100, Guillaume Rousse wrote:
> >> as the title says...
> >> gpc is gnu pascal, BTW
> > Why another pascal compiler?
>
> This from a man who already ships 4 C compilers, 2 Java compilers, 2 native
> assemblers, 2 Prologs, 2 Haskells, at least 3 LISPs and a partridge in a pear
> tree?
>
Well, you wish to have (yet) another compiler?
Remember, the distrib is quite big already, we have 3 CD (inc. contrib),
my personal opinion is that only include it if you think that it will
really benefit people, or if assuming that gpc is better then why keep fpc
around?
- G.
